Kenora Elections 2026 All Candidates Forum

Questions and Answers from the online Facebook Forum
Good morning Kenora. This question comes from Jay Barnard
"Kenora talks a lot about addiction, mental health, public safety and the challenges we see in our community. But organizations led by people with lived and living experience are often doing the work on the ground with very little municipal support. If you are elected to Kenora City Council, what specific, measurable action will you personally advocate for to ensure lived and living experience organizations like Empower2Recover have a meaningful seat at the table - not just when there is a crisis, but when decisions, strategies and resources around addiction, recovery and community well-being are being developed - and how should the public hold you accountable if that doesn’t happen?”
Answer:
On the specific question about "measurable action...to ensure lived and living experience organizations....have a meaningful seat at the table". I am open to engaging with those organizations and willing individuals with lived experience when continuing to develop strategies within the CSWB Plan framework. They provide a unique perspective on how effective the strategies and resources applied to addiction are in the path to recovery. I also think it is important to distinguish between participants and those responsible for actions (service providers). Input can come from many sources but responsibility for actions must fall on a specific person or group. This is the way to ensure some accountability for the actions identified in the CSWB Plan. One concern I have with the Plan is that it lacks some tangible, short-term, street level results. A 10 year plan is great but we need to concentrate on some short term actions that improve the current state downtown in particular.
Today's question comes from Gerry Standingready.
"ᴏᴜʀ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴛʏ ᴄᴏɴᴛɪɴᴜᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴀᴄᴇ ᴄʜᴀʟʟᴇɴɢᴇꜱ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʜᴏᴜꜱɪɴɢ, ʜᴏᴍᴇʟᴇꜱꜱɴᴇꜱꜱ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴀᴄᴄᴇꜱꜱ ᴛᴏ ꜱᴀꜰᴇ ɢᴀᴛʜᴇʀɪɴᴇ ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇꜱ. ᴅᴏ ʏᴏᴜ ꜱᴜᴘᴘᴏʀᴛ ᴄʀᴇᴀᴛɪɴɢ ᴀ 24-ʜᴏᴜʀ ꜱʜᴇʟᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴛʏ ᴄᴇɴᴛʀᴇ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴠɪꜱɪᴏɴ, ꜰᴜɴᴅɪɴɢ ꜱᴛʀᴀᴛᴇɢʏ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴛɪᴍᴇʟɪɴᴇ ʙᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴍᴀᴋɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ʜᴀᴘᴘᴇɴ?"
Answer:
I support creating a 24-hour shelter and community center. There the easy part is done. Now the hard part. How do we create such a space? How do we fund it? Who runs it?
The current model has the City supporting and facilitating the activities of a number of service providers who provide shelter and housing in Kenora. These service providers include the new HART Hub supported by KCA, WNHAC, KDSB, KACL and CMHA-K; the RAAM clinic supported by Ontario Health/LWDH; Morningstar Center supported by Ontario Health/LWDH; Migizi supported by ISC and Ontario Health/LWDH; CMHA-Kenora Shelter, Safe Bed program and mental health programs; the LWDH ER, OPP, Makwa Patrol, Ambulance and Hospital outpatient mental health programs. These service providers have a variety of services consisting of day to day support through longer term treatment programs. The beds available through the various programs number over 100.
The homeless, street people in our community are supported daily by the Kenora Fellowship Center, Neechee Friendship Center, St. Albans, Jubilee Church and the shelter (CMHA-K) who provide food, clothes and showers if requested. These providers receive funding from a number of government funded programs as well as support from private citizens in the form of money and volunteers. I apologize if I missed a service provider or two, as you can see the provider community is complex.
The Provincial Government requires municipalities to complete a Community Safety and Well Being (CSWB) Plan. Kenora began this process in 2023, with the plan adopted by City Council in 2025. Since that time the CSWB Implementation Committee has been working on implementing the recommendations of the plan. Progress on implementation of the recommendations can be reviewed by visiting the dashboard at Community Safety and Well-Being Plan Progress Dashboard | City of Kenora
So back to the 24-hour shelter and community center. Given all the services provided, is an additional shelter necessary? Are the current service offerings completely full (I think they are but we need data). Understanding the who/where/what of the service provider community is required before jumping on yet another well-intentioned idea that further complicates the situation.
The CSWB Plan Implementation Committee is the group that brings the service providers together and can improve the effectiveness of the numerous funding streams currently available. Priority Area Five: Housing along the continuum, provides some actions to address similar needs as a 24-hour shelter.
In the short term (Oct - April) there is an immediate need for places to keep warm. The City can assist with short term warming spaces in municipal facilities. The general population must be patient when these facilities are open to the street folks.
I support a measured, informed, well thought out approach based on input from service providers and users of the system. The work done by the CSWB Plan implementation committee has provided a greater understanding of the overall situation and they are the people to lead this initiative, with the full support of City Council.
Under With the new term of Council a new committee will be appointed. Applications for membership on the Committee are available at City Hall. Think about applying if you have something to contribute.
This question comes from Michélle Bradshaw.
"ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʜʀᴇᴇ ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ɪᴍᴘᴏʀᴛᴀɴᴛ ᴏᴜᴛᴄᴏᴍᴇꜱ ʏᴏᴜ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴋᴇɴᴏʀᴀ ᴛᴏ ᴀᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇ ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇxᴛ ꜰᴏᴜʀ ʏᴇᴀʀꜱ? ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴍᴇᴀꜱᴜʀᴀʙʟᴇ ʀᴇꜱᴜʟᴛ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ᴛᴇʟʟ ʀᴇꜱɪᴅᴇɴᴛꜱ ʏᴏᴜ ꜱᴜᴄᴄᴇᴇᴅᴇᴅ"?
Answer:
In answer to the question above, I chose four outcomes the next council will progress over their term.
1. Economic development. Leveraging the Campus of Care development. In the next four years I expect a new Long Term Care facility and a Hotel/commercial development to be constructed on the property. The new Hospital should be in construction by the end of the four year period as well. Redevelopment of the Kenricia Hotel is expected to be complete by the end of this term of Council. While these objectives involve several community partners, they can be championed by the new City Council.
2. City Infrastructure. Two additions to sewer and water systems within the city are expected to be completed within the next 4 years. One at the Campus of Care and another along Rabbit Lake road. These expansions will increase the municipal tax base, potentially reducing the overall funding burden for the sewer and water systems.
3. Housing. We currently have a housing crisis in the city and need to start acting like it.
1. Expedite development of the Campus of Care residential development. The city will be investing significant infrastructure funding for this development and cannot wait for the residential portion of the plans to be executed. Within the next 4 years, 25% of the ultimate plan of 800 residences should be complete. Target 200 new residences on this property.
2. Facilitate building of new residences on both serviced and un-serviced vacant lots in the city. Following an inventory of available lots, a target of having residences on 30% of these lots within the 4 year council term is a viable target.
4. CSWB Plan Implementation. The city largely plays a coordination role in implementing the Community Safety and Well Being plan. A current estimate of implementation is 30%. It is realistic to expect that the plan should be 60% implemented in the next 4 years. This will result in fewer homeless people on the street.
These are measurable targets that can be used to gauge the success of the new Council.
Question from Marlene Elder:
"What are your thoughts on the expropriation of the Kenricia Hotel? Do you agree with it and why? And if so how do you propose to house the 16+ people living there who are facing eviction?"
Answer:
The expropriation is the best of numerous poor alternatives. It had become obvious that the current owners were incapable or unwilling to fund a full upgrade to the building. Given that the Kenricia is a focal point of the downtown, it needs to be redeveloped. So I agree with the expropriation and applaud the outgoing council for thier initiative. Regarding the residents, my understanding is that they will be subsidized for a period of 3 months after leaving the Kenricia. During this period alternate accommodations can be found. If there are any former residents still without permanent accommodations the City will bare some responsibility for that and need to find them a place to live. Displacement is difficult at any time and we need to be sensitive to the situation.
Question from Donna Wildfong:
Aside from the CSWB, I’ve listed a few key ideas and would like to hear if the candidates feel these actions could benefit Kenora’s rising crisis in relation to Homelessness and Addiction.
As a whole, I keep a positive outlook of hope and compassion. Recognizing our problems are complex and require critical thinking, I feel we must move Kenora forward from the daily suffering we see on our streets by finding workable solutions.
Here are the ideas;
1. Leverage the HART Hub Model:
Secure capital and operational funding from provincial health ministries. For instance, Ontario has heavily invested in Homelessness, Addiction, Recovery and Treatment (HART) Hubs. Smaller hub cities are establishing dedicated Indigenous-led HART Hub programs to blend clinical care, traditional healing, and stabilization beds without draining municipal property taxes.
2. Legalize Alternative Housing Models:
Pass rapid zoning updates to permit modular housing, micro-shelters, and tiny home villages. Traditional zoning bylaws often unintentionally criminalize or block low-cost housing models.
3. Fund a Dedicated Housing Navigator:
Allocate a micro-grant from your city's portion of the federal Reaching Home Rural and Remote streamto fund a dedicated Housing Navigator. This position acts as a liaison, ensuring that anyone leaving a care institution is handed off directly to a supportive housing bed rather than the street.
4. Establish a Data-Driven "By-Name" List
In a population of 15,000, the chronically unhoused demographic is a distinct, knowable group—typically ranging from dozens to a few hundred individuals. You do not need to guess who needs help.
The Shared Registry: Implement a secure, cross-agency digital registry known as a By-Name List. Every frontline agency—from the local food bank to the community hospital—contributes to this single list, tracking the specific acuity level and history of each individual.
Coordinated Discharge Planning: Hold weekly "service tables" where local stakeholders review the list by name. This ensures that individuals being discharged from regional hospitals, mental health facilities, or correctional settings are met immediately with housing supports rather than slipping directly onto the street.
Answer:
I agree that use of AI in research can be useful, as long as it is reviewed to make sure the research is correct. I did not use AI in my responses.
1. Leverage the HART Hub Model.
The HART or Harm Addiction Recovery Treatment for Kenora was announced in early 2025. I understand it has been active for a while, operating out of the Shelter at Knox United Church. Well funded and well organized, it is intended to address homelessness and addiction by wrapping services around and managing clients in a no use (drugs or alcohol) environment. It is intended to use the idea of wrap around integrated services to assist clients across all providers with the use of a common tracking tool.
2. Legalize Alternative Housing Models:
This needs more thought. I have worked on zoning issues with several municipalities and it is often the unintended consequences of good intentions that mess things up. While it is clear that the planning department needs to keep industrial property away from residential, things get muddy when talking about multi-use residential and single dwelling residential. I do agree that there should be a path for low-cost housing models in our city and that Council must play a role by addressing it in the upcoming Official Plan review. This is the greatest long term issue currently facing our city.
3. Fund a Dedicated Housing Navigator.
This may be covered by the HART hub model but I defer to those involved. It is a good idea, if it can be funded.
4. Establish a Data-Driven "By-Name" List
Also covered by the HART hub concept. We will need to touch base with them to see how well it is working.
The HART hub is new and should be publicized. It addresses several of the action items identified in the Community Safety and Well-Being Plan and I see it as complimentary. I particularly applaud CMHA and the other service providers for implementation of this model.
Question:
A question to all candidates, what is your perspective on the best ways to collaborate with other levels of government to ensure a sustainable and prosperous future for Kenora and the surrounding areas?
Answer:
The best strategy when working with other levels of government begins with focused communication built around existing programs and having a consistent message. It is important to show how supporting the city proposal benefits them. Politicians want to look good and bureaucrats want to not look bad. Success with lobbying requires both. I have managed lobbying efforts for several companies. I have met with Premiers, Ministers and many bureaucrats. I have also assisted municipal and First Nations lobbying efforts at both the Federal and Provincial levels. I understand how to work with politicians and bureaucrats to get to YES. I have worked with some of the best lobbyists in the country and learned a few things along the way that would be useful in Council Chambers.
Question from New Resident:
"𝑫𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒔𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒑𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒂 𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒈-𝒂𝒘𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚?"
Answer:
Mort Goss Answer:
those figures were originally mounted on large concrete columns as, I believe, a feature of the engineering design of the bridge. My understanding is that that type of column might compromise the existing bridge, and that there has been discussion of mounting them elsewhere. I attended a presentation at The Muse during my last term of council, and a few options were presented. I'm not sure what the current status or plans include, but I do understand the difficulty of finding an appropriate location of these large figures.
This could be a discussion point for the new council, but understand that there are many, many pressing and critical issues that incoming council will need to address urgently.
My answer:
Mort has provide a good explanation. I would only add that we should discuss the future of these items with our local First Nation communities before deciding how to proceed.
Your Opinion Matters
Help us build a stronger Kenora. Send your comments and I will respond.
EMAIL: kenoramichael@gmail.com